“These concerns (for orphan children in India and elsewhere in the world) are very good, but often these same people are not concerned with the millions that are killed by the deliberate decision of their own mothers. And this is what is the greatest destroyer of peace today, Abortion…For the pregnant women who don’t want their children, give them to me.” – Mother Teresa
A real touching words from a women who was a mother to this diabolic world. If we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell other people to not kill each other? Any country that accepts abortion is not teaching its people to love, but to use any violence to get what they want. You may have 1000 reasons to justify your devils act but none of them can justify an act which takes a life unless he or she can create it at their wish.
The issue of abortion is one of the most contentious, and emotive dilemmas faced by modern societies. The question is whether one should allow the termination of a child whilst it is in its mother’s womb. For some, the question is even more fundamental: at what stage is the foetus in the womb to be regarded as a child? At conception? At birth? Or, maybe somewhere between. The battle-lines are drawn between strict, religious (‘pro-life’) arguments (that it is never permissible), and those (‘pro-choice’) that emphasise the mother’s right to choose as the primary concern. Yes we believe that a woman has the right to choose what happens to her body and her organs but we don’t believe she has the right to kill another human being to better her life still.
What about the father? What rights does the father have over a fetus? If a mother seeks an abortion, can a father that wants “life” for his child defend it? And, what if the mother wants to give birth to her child, while the father desires an abortion? What say does the father have? Is this, therefore, simply a question of the woman’s rights, or the father’s rights as well?
Moreover what about the Fetus, Is it wrong to assign rights to the fetus? Is it not a person? Is it like wanted fetuses are beloved “babies”; unwanted ones are “tissue” (inconsistent). Life is an individual right, not a privilege, for unborn humans.
Have you ever thought what would be your answer if your unborn child is questioning your love for child. Will any mother ever say that they don’t like children or they never wanted their beloved. I don’t think so.. THEN WHYYY?? If every feminine life have a self realization and it is by becoming a mother it shows the value of being a mother. Then why some times this MOTHER thing becomes a bother to personal life and why they want to avoid it ??? Hard to give a satisfactory answer HUH??
All human life–from the moment of conception and through all subsequent stages–is sacred, because human life is created in the image and likeness of God. Nothing surpasses the greatness or dignity of a human person…If a person’s right to life is violated at the moment in which he is first conceived in his mother’s womb, an indirect blow is struck also at the whole moral order.
So here there is no conclusion as it’s hard to change the world unless we be the CHANGE… If the anti-abortion movement took a tenth of the energy they put into noisy theatrics and devoted it to improving the lives of children who have been born into lives of poverty, violence, and neglect, they could make a world shine. I’ve noticed that everybody that is for abortion has already been born…………..
Yofiel's Blog 